September 27, 2017

3 Rewards of Accepting Change: A Guest Post by Katie



     As a young girl, I embraced every word my father said. How could I not? He was so confident in his beliefs, so assertive of his opinions, so sure of his veracity. Every sports team, election, current eventhe had the answers, and I accepted them. However, I grew to find myself more in disagreeance with my former moral authority, and that was hard to acknowledge. I felt guilt that I no longer shared his opinions dogmatically, and I didn’t know how to express my changed and differing opinions without hearing an unwarranted, one-sided tirade. In my newfound maturity, I began to accept that others have differing opinions, and it’s not okay to treat people as if their beliefs are invalid. We should engage in open debate with the impartiality that allows us to change our opinions and beliefs should we find the counterargument sound. And this change should not be seen as fickle or weak, but as a sign that someone is strong enough in character to accept when he or she is wrong.

     In an effort to convince the reader of the opinion I’ve shared above, here are three ways that accepting change in others and in ourselves strengthens relationships, opens the doors to self-improvement, and creates a more peaceful society.

Accepting Change Dissolves Enmity

     “A good leader can engage in a debate frankly and thoroughly, knowing that at the end he and the other side must be closer, and thus emerge stronger. You don't have that idea when you are arrogant, superficial, and uninformed.” –Nelson Mandela in an interview with Oprah

     Where I come from, the demographic stands very strongly in favor of one political side. Everyone assumes that his or her neighbor agrees that one candidate is righteous, and the other side is evil by virtue of which side of the political spectrum they are on.

     When my mother-in-law heard that my husband and I attended a caucus for the “opposing side,” her immediate reaction was disownment. Though she was joking about the severity that is estrangement, I do not believe her reaction was fabricated.

     Reflecting on this occasion, I have wondered if she was just disappointed that her son no longer shared the ideals that she had taught him in childhood, or if she feared that he had adopted some beliefs that she views as immoral and evil simply by virtue that they belong to the other political party. I can’t help but speculate that she saw the change in her son and instantly put up a wall because his beliefs began to challenge hers. From this one incident, could she continue to trust her son’s judgement?

     The damage here is that many people discredit a person’s intelligence or moral character based on a disagreeing belief—because a person does not believe the disagreed-upon belief, they assume the belief-holder cannot logically think through concepts, and thus cannot be trusted in terms of judgement. Furthermore, they assume that a person adopts all beliefs of an institution when they accept one or a few.

     This also applies to when a person decides to change his or her beliefs: people close to them will often judge that he or she is feeble-minded, weak-willed, blown about by any fancy idea, and, thus, untrustworthy and should be discredited.

     Unfortunately, and almost unconsciously, this creates an enmity that dissolves friendships and distances loved ones.

     When we adopt the “us versus them” mentality, we throw up walls of pride that prevents us from learning to truly understand the other person. We dismiss them as stupid, wrong, immoral, or evil. Enmity spawns hate, callous competition, and in extreme cases, violence toward our fellow man.

     If we can accept that most people are ultimately on the same side in this uncertain world, despite differing opinions and beliefs, even when the expressed convictions hurt our own pride, then we can learn to see people for who they are, not for who we assume them to be. This will build better relationships and a more tolerant society.


Accepting Change Reduces Dogmatism

     When we develop enmity with others based on their beliefs, we sometimes adopt other beliefs of our own institutions more indiscriminately to defend ourselves against the opposing view. We begin to justify or rationalize the beliefs of our institution to eliminate any counterargument against its validity. We begin to dogmatically accept beliefs without considering their errancy.

     This action of accepting all beliefs of an institution we subscribe to sets up that institution as an ultimate moral authority, disregarding the fateful fallibility of any man-made establishment. This in turn creates extremism that results in, once again, enmity toward our fellow man. This also impedes our overall growth and advancement: we get in a rut that does not allow for exploration.

To accept change is to climb out of this trench of dogmatism.

     The zen monk and teacher Shunryu Suzuki bestowed wisdom upon us when he said:

Without accepting the fact that everything changes, we cannot find perfect composure. Unfortunately, although it is true, it is difficult for us to accept it. Because we cannot accept the truth of transience, we suffer.



Accepting Change Allows Growth

     As this blog is titled, the word for not changing is death. But I think we begin to perish as soon as we deny the idea of changing. A scholar will inspect his or her own beliefs in scrutiny and change the very foundation of his or her character if it means changing for the better.

     Though this arbitrary idea of “better” is often subjective, a person can ask a few basic questions to truly understand his or her core beliefs. Ponder a few rudimentary assertions, asking “Do I believe…,” such as, “Do I believe it’s wrong to hurt people?” “Do I believe in right versus wrong?” “Do I believe truth exists?” Change can come easily when we find that we do or do not believe in a fundamental concept from which more complex concepts grow.

     And always remember: these changes must not be permanent! Experiences change our perceptions, and our understanding of the world around us will always grow with us. Accepting this will allow us to accept ourselves when we find ourselves changing. And keeping this in mind will allow us to accept change in others.

     When we find ourselves looking upon others in contempt, we will often find that it is the result of a differing opinion. Whether this person has changed from believing what we believe, or we discover that this person always believed contrary to our own beliefs, we must understand that a differing opinion does not invalidate a person’s worth or intelligence; we must accept the possibility that our own beliefs could be incorrect; and we must be tolerant in our discussions with the other person. To be willing to change is to allow ourselves to build stronger relationships, an improved self, and a better world.

September 12, 2017

Monogamy: Partner Ownership




This post is a follow up from my previous post on monogamy

     Once I had changed my mind about relationship jealousy, I still had a lot of distance to cover before I changed my mind about monogamy entirely. Plenty of monogamous couples are far more mature than I was and live without jealousy, and yet remain monogamous. While working through my jealousy/insecurity was a step along the path, it was just one part of the process of coming to polyamory. Another idea entrenching monogamy as the only acceptable relationship style was what I am referring to as "partner ownership."
   
      Jealousy isn't the only thing that was enforcing monogamy in my life. It is a cultural norm that a person should expect any person they are romantically involved with to forego such a relationship with any other person. Even as I over came my insecurity that my partner may find someone else they like more than me and leave me for them, I still felt like they owed me their entire being or like they somehow belonged to me. I may not have directly or openly claimed to be in charge of them in anyway, but I expected to have some direction over their choices. If they did something without consulting me then it could be considered somehow a betrayal or reason for losing trust.

     And it wasn't just about expecting to direct (or help direct, I like to think I wasn't THAT overbearing, but maybe they would disagree) their life, but also about expecting to control their time on a more hour by hour scale. My expectations here went something like, "if you are dating me, I can expect that you spend however much time I feel is appropriate on me." This may not have been manifest in such clear terms in my mind, but expressed in expecting them to do things that they didn't enjoy with me for the sake of proving that they loved me. I'm not saying that it isn't a nice thing to do to give up some of your time to engage your partner in their hobbies, but coming from the other side, expecting or telling them they have to indicates that you require it of them. I have seen this in relationships where one person wants to do something and another wants to sit back and relax. I have seen the person who wants to relax try to guilt the person who wants to engage in some activity into just lounging around, despite the obvious antsiness of their partner. Relationship jealousy is one manifestation of insecurity, but another is trying to control everything around you for fear if you don't that everything you have will crumble.

     This is a particularly bad reaction to insecurity in regards to the people around you. Tightening your grip simultaneously pushes people away and makes you mistrust any evidence of their love that may exist. I started to recognize this in myself when my response to being told by someone that they love was to question them. My mind instantly went to, "Do you though?" I would be really surprised if I was the only person to experience this, but for myself I recognized it came from a sense of entitlement to love from partners. My train of thought going something like, "Of course you are saying that, you owe it to me. Of course you are continuing this relationship, you married me and now have no choice in the matter."

     That lack of choice in the matter is what made me realize I had done a terrible disservice to my partners under the guise of love. I held my partners' affections hostage under threat of destruction of whatever life we had built together. Even if it wasn't in open threat, spoken out loud as a warning, it is common knowledge that break-ups are horrible things. The more entangled your lives have grown, the more ability your partner has to take away the things you have spent your time building, including your reputation and other relationships. How many stories are told in gossip in the end of a relationship, spreading the things that one partner has done to hurt another? These things have a way of damaging the familial relationships that develop over time with each partners parents and friends, and often ending them entirely. Even if I never said them, I knew that being in a relationship, and especially a monogamous relationship meant that a partner had invested so many of their resources in me that their support system outside of myself (both financially and in drifting away from family and friends) meant that to leave me was a large hassle, and a large risk to a partners mental health and financial stability.

     The difficulty of disentangling two lives is often seen as a comforting safety in a relationship, i.e. my partner wont leave me on a whim, but is a double edged sword that means that my partner may stay in a relationship with me long after they no longer want to, out of fear and shear difficulty. For myself, I came to realize that not only was this a contributor to my insecurity and a builder of belief that my partner is only with me because they have to be, but also a logical inconsistency between my professed love for them and my restricting them from pursuing whatever course may make them happy.

     I think that without this element of logic, I wouldn't have fully realized how my relationship style contributed to my own personal unhappiness. I have written here first about effects my world view had on my life practically, but the decision to make a change didn't come from those negative effects. I am an incredibly stubborn person, and will live my life in the way I have decided despite whatever pain it my bring me. I will lose friends, I will repeatedly walk myself into a wall, if I belief that is the right thing to do based on my perception of the world. I spent most of my life as a strong deontologist, and though I recognize the practical benefits of consequentialism, and find it more and more relevant, the tendency to create rules and follow them to my self destruction has been well trained into my psyche. Sometimes the rule is more consciously defined than others, but this one didn't need to be. It was built off the culture that exists around monogamy in the world I grew up in, and was naturally adopted by myself.

     Several things drew my attention to the my own logical inconsistencies around it. The first was a TED talk I came across. Titled, "Why Happy Couples Cheat," it described the way our culture has changed the way it views relationships and monogamy in modernity, and how the purpose of relationships have changed. It is a great talk, and worth listening to, but the parts that stuck out for me was a description of how cheating in relationships often has little to do with a intrinsic fault in the way that two people connect, and the motivations that people have for secret relationships can be entirely relatable. The common refrain of those wronged in the act of cheating cited in the talk "You think I didn't want more? But I am not the one who did it!" marked for me the fact that even in being wronged people are able understand why someone would want to pursue relationships outside of their exclusive relationship. If not universal, it seems that most people can think of at least one reason why they would want to. There are some good reasons listed in the TED talk and I recommend it if you have some time to give it a listen. There are legitimate reasons why people are drawn towards cheating, even though the act of betraying ones partner is entirely reprehensible.


   

     As an example, I have had several close acquaintances who have, after marrying and having children, left a religion that abhors homosexuality. Having left that environment and feeling able to listen to their own feelings, they realized an attraction to members of their own gender. Having repressed such feelings so deeply that they are only able to discover it later in their life, already married and in committed relationships, they are in a position that a certain part of themselves has become off limits to explore. This without any knowledge that this would be the position they would be in upon entering the relationship. This would never excuse them cheating, but could make them somewhat resentful for the position they have found themselves. They may never act on that, but still feel like they have missed out on a part of life or themselves, having never had the chance to pursue relationships with a large portion of the population that they had previously forbidden for themselves.

     For myself, realizing that there could be these sorts of things that my partner may be foregoing out of respect and love for me, or out of the difficulty it would cause them were they to pursue it, or however it may feel in their mind, made me feel sad. I wouldn't want the threat of emotion and financial ruin to be the only reason a person was with me, and more importantly I realized I could no longer feel comfortable feeling like I was owed that. I saw the inconsistency of telling someone I love them and then getting in the way of something that was a part of them, or something they thought might make them happy. If I love someone for who they are, not for the fact they are willing to give up a part of themselves for me to be able to accept them.



     It took me a lot of time to work through my jealousy issues around letting go of owning my partner and their affections. However, noticing that I had been given power and ownership over her by our past view of how a relationship should be, I had no choice but to release that grip over my partner at the time of this realization. I did not want that grip to be the only reason she was with me, for my own security and for her happiness. I wanted my love for her to be a commitment to her happiness, and not do anything to get in the way of that.

     What does that look like for me? I told her the realization I had come to. I told her that I did not want to block her happiness, I didn't want to repress her in any way. If she wants to pursue relationships with other people, including sexual ones, I am happy for her. If she doesn't want to be with me, I will do my best to facilitate that transition, rather than be a barrier to it. I do not want to own her, or for our relationship to be a shackle around her legs. And the results have been incredibly freeing for the both of us.

     For her, she is able to know that I support her in meeting her needs and wants in life in the best way that seems suitable for her. For me I am able to be free from the questioning of whether or not she wants to spend time with me, because I know if she did not want to do so, she wouldn't. It is beautiful the way that letting go of the chains of ownership on my partner has done more to free me than any other pursuit of freedom I have tried. This change in my world view has also allowed me to feel closer in all of my relationships romantic and otherwise, in a way that I was previously preventing myself from doing. It feels good when updating your beliefs, which may seem theoretical or not immediately practically applicable lead to positive changes in your life. This one definitely has, but that isn't necessarily the point of getting rid of inconsistencies in your life. The point is striving towards self honesty and true integrity. Knowing what you believe and how you got there. For myself that is the goal, independent of whether or not that makes life easier or more pleasant.
More Than Two: A Practical Guide to Ethical Polyamory 

Note: You can listen to More Than Two with a free trial of Audible here! And it helps support the blog!

The Bayesian Conspiracy episode about polyamory. Basically, this is 3 people talking about the different ways they practice polyamory/non-monogamy.


August 13, 2017

Homosexuality


By Kjerish - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=54180877

     I still remember the first time I met an openly gay person.

     I was 17 years old, riding a greyhound bus to Nashville to visit my best friend, who had just moved there. This was my first real venture into the world as a solo person, away from home and alone. It was an eventful journey, enough so that I remember more about the bus ride to Nashville than my time there. The bus left Salt Lake just ahead of a large snow storm that was moving eastward. In Rock Springs, Wyoming the bus driver broke their arm in attempting to put chains on the tires of the bus. Rock Springs isn't exactly a hub for greyhound and it was 8 hours until a replacement driver got us back on the road. This 8 hour delay extended a 1.5 day bus ride into a 2.5 day bus ride, as we were now in the thick of the storm as it rolled across the country. This gave large amounts of time to talk to fellow passengers. From Salt Lake to St Louis, I rode next to an older man who enjoyed conversation a bit more than I did. My memory is not particularly visual so I am unable to recall what he looked like, solely that I classified him as older. After more than a day of talking with this guy, I can still remember the moment when he revealed that he was gay. He was traveling from San Diego to Boston to visit someone, and I inquired as to how he was able to have that much free time. He replied that he was on disability (which given my privileged upbringing I had never really heard of) because he had AIDS, which he mentioned as being common among gay men like himself. I was mortified. I remember texting a friend, "He's Gay!!!" I did not even know how to process this information. In my mind I had just met someone who had casually admitted to being a step below a murderer. I was uncomfortable sitting near him moving forward, and looked for the first opportunity to put distance between us without seeming too incredibly rude.

     Flash forward to a time when I was a missionary in South Africa, which at the time probably had even less openly gay people than Utah. I remember the disgust I felt learning that someone I was teaching was gay. We burned all the records we had of teaching them in our desire to distance ourselves from the horror. Contrast this with the patience that I was able to put into working with a person who had admitted to repeatedly raping his daughter and then hiding the results with multiple abortions. At the time I was willing to give this person a chance to change their life, yet was insulted and disgusted that another had the audacity to sit and talk to me while being gay. Intellectually I know that I was a product of my culture in my horror, and in regularly using "gay" as the most insulting term I could think of, but it is hard to not feel ashamed of myself for not having the human decency to know better. Overcoming this visceral disgust and hate was a long and arduous journey. There are only a few things in my life that I have ever felt so strongly enough about.

     As much as I hate to admit it, this is one of the things I have changed my mind about that I don't feel like I can really take that much credit for. In things I have written about up to this point, my change of heart came after much effort to try to reevaluate my view. This is one that just pulled me along. I think I had felt too deeply about it that it had gone past all reason. In that way it was beyond my ability to critically examine, but took help from the outside to reach in and break down the hardness of my heart. There are  a few sources that I credit with softening my heart, so that when I did actually look at how I felt about this issue, I found that my mind had already changed on its own.

     First of all was the writing of Orson Scott Card. This may come as a surprise as age seems to have turned his views far more conservative than they once were, but the first gay character I ever read about was in his novel Songmaster. Ender's Game and the trilogy that follow it were the first real exploration of the importance of tolerance that I really understood. There could have been many others trying to reach me, but these novels really opened my mind to the importance of  recognizing when you are unable to understand an other's perspective and practicing patience and love in those instances, rather than lashing out. I learned about tolerance from the mistakes of Ender, and the way he spent the rest of his life trying to spread tolerance and understanding among humanity. I do not know of any other character from any other story who put as much effort into teaching people how little we may know about those around us, and how unable we are to judge them properly based on the little we do know. 


     Second is punk rock, and the music scene surrounding punk and ska in my area at the time. There are of course hateful elements of the punk genre, but Salt Lake at the time had a strong community built around unity. It wasn't necessarily that people at shows were talking about homosexuality specifically, but the emphasis on ending hate in all forms showed me what how to put tolerance into practice. I feel like I owe a great deal to examples of good people I met, and the art that they made. Music has been one of the few things that was been able to reach past the walls I put up against critical thinking and make me willing to consider points of view that were beyond my reach.

     Though changing my mind about the way LGBT people should be treated was something I fought anytime it came up consciously, the rising prominence in popular culture of the movement for equal rights brought plenty of time for my internal conflict between the ideals of equality and tolerance and my homophobia and belief that gay marriage should be illegal to be apparent. Not being the most self aware person at the time I lament that I am unable to point to the exact process of how I came to change my mind about these things I felt so strongly about. I do not think that it all hinged on one moment, but rather was a swelling up of conflict that had been suppressed for an extended period. However, if it was something that happened all at once, I certainly know what that moment was. It is one of the more clear memories of my life. May of 2013. At the time I was going to school at Utah State University and on the weekends I was delivering pizzas in Salt Lake 100 miles away. As such my wife, son Ezra, and I would stay with family on the weekends and one Sunday morning after a long night taking care of the nearly 1 year old Ezra, I put on some Stephen Colbert. The musical guest was Macklemore, and he performed his song "Same Love," and talked about the way that homophobia and misogyny were glorified in hip hop and the culture at large.


The moment from Macklemore that brought me to the realization of the need for change on my view

     I wish I knew why this was the moment that it finally clicked how much hate I held in my heart and how poorly it was justified. My son, Ezra, was so incredibly important to me that I built my whole life around him, and I remember the important thing in my mind being something along the lines of "Ezra can't grow up feeling this way, I can't be an example of discrimination and intolerance for something I do not understand." I knew I was in the wrong, and I realized I had to change my actions and opinions to match my actual values. I was not living up to my own ideals, and if I wasn't careful I would be leading my son down that same path of professing ones values as one thing, and then actively working against them. I needed to bring my word and my behavior together and live more authentically, even if it meant swimming against the current of culture.



     So in lieu of being able fully describe how I was able to change my mind on this topic, I will offer instead an apology. For all those who were unable to feel comfortable being themselves in a culture of repression that I contributed to, I am sorry. I know you were around me and unable to feel safe being out, and a part of that was due to the judgement I passed on you, and the hate that I propagated. Its far too little too late, but I am sorry for my part, for going with the flow and actively contributing to the flow. May we all work for a world for our children that doesn't make them feel ostracized for being who they are, gay or straight, black or white, religious or not. All I know how to do is move forward away from the pain I have caused, towards a place where all feel welcome and supported in their own skin. We can actually make a better world, and we can actually build our community to match our ideals and our values. I guess I just want to say, lets actually do it.